When I was 18, I told my father I wanted to be president. We were driving up to Boston and discussing politics. I remember him turning to me and saying, "No, you could never do that. Try something else." as if it were some sort of unfathomably hilarious declaration for his daughter to be making.
From the moment I was conceived, the only thing I probably had going for me in favor of presidential aspirations was that I was an American citizen by birth (as much as we may try to deny it, New Jersey
is part of the United States). I am a minority and female. I don't have old family money that affords me connections and security. In fact, I don't have that much money at all. I went to public school, got into college based on my own merits, and worked hard for the grades on my transcript, which are not fantastic, but I am proud of them because it represents me. All of that is quite possibly the complete opposite of what the current president amounted to in the first 20 years of his life.
I just finished reading a Boston Globe article outlining the ways in which President Bush has been blatantly throwing legislature to the dogs. In his entire presidency, he has not vetoed any bills presented to him by congress, however; after signing each bill with a flourish, he has written up signing statements outlining how he interprets the laws he just passed. In these statements, he 'specializes' the law, declaring that several sections are unconstitutional and that he is not required to abide by them because of his executive power as the president and commander in chief of the army. These laws include those that protect the privacy of U.S. citizens. Many of these bills have been passed by congress in efforts to check the president's power, to require him to report when he wiretaps private phone lines or "before diverting money from an authorized program in order to start a secret operation, such as the ''black sites" where suspected terrorists are secretly imprisoned (Boston Globe)".
The list goes on and on, but those are just a few of the laws that he has 'reshaped' that have struck me. Signing statements have become more popular in the last several administrations. Regan, Bush Sr., and Clinton all submitted signing statements with many bills that they signed. The range is in the 100-250 for each president. But these presidents also vetoed bills that they had serious disagreement with. The Current president has passed every bill put before him, and has issued 750 signing statements. Congress is supposed to check the power of the president, as outlined and intended by the U.S. constitution, but since congress is in a Republican majority, it is reluctant to confront a president whose interests are tied with their own. Must I really go on?
I know that politics is corrupt by definition. There is no ideal government, as I'm sure Marx can tell you. But this is a blatant defiance and ignorance of what the United States constitution stands for. By claiming all power to the executive office, President Bush is offsetting the system of balance that our government rests upon. We are not supposed to have just one source of power, we are supposed to balanced by the judicial, executive, and legislative branches. He is not only affecting the current administration but also influencing future administrations with his 'interpretations' of laws. I apologize to those of you who are supporters of the current president, but I just do not understand. I'd love to know what it is you see in him.
It may not be possible, but I would love to see a change. I would love to see someone elected to office who has integrity and the well being of his people in mind. Someone who earns his power through respect and the ability to see past his own beliefs, not with the influence of his family and money. Someone who has made mistakes and
learned from them.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/04/30/bush_challenges_hundreds_of_laws